<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>
<channel rdf:about="www.gavstestandtag.com.au">
<title>My blog</title>
<link>http://www.gavstestandtag.com.au</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
<dc:rights>gavstestandtag.com.au</dc:rights>
<dc:date>2011-5-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>gavstestandtag.com.au</dc:creator>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="link+1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="link+2" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="link+1">
<title></title>
<link>http://www.gavstestandtag.com.au/page2.htm#95075</link>
<description>DIY vs. Outsourced Testing amp Tagging. In
these times of economic unrest most companies are now looking internally and
seeing how they can cut back on unnecessary expenses. One industry that has
noticed this is the Testing and Tagging industry. Is this really worth it Is
it better for you to do your own testing and tagging on electrical items or is
it more cost effective to outsource to a professional test and tag company like
Gavs Test amp Tag. 

Gavs Test amp Tag
says outsourcing is still the most cost effective option when it comes to
testing and tagging your electrical appliances. 

The
things companies may not realise is the ongoing expenses associated with doing
it yourself include consumables tags asset register software tester repairs
and regular Portable Appliance Tester PAT tester calibrations which can all
add up to be quite expensive.  

Having
a current employee for do the companies testing and tagging means that you are
taking them away from their usu...</description>
<dc:date>2011-5-30 11:18:22</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

